Episode 24: The Riddle Between Us.
Our World is not Conclusion.
It is an aperture—
Through which all certainties escape,
And all questions pour in.
A Species stands beyond—
Not angel, nor god, nor demon—
But something older than intention,
Older than every name.
Invisible, as Silence—
Yet undeniable as the stars.
It does not flatter us,
Nor bend to our hopes—
And still, sometimes,
It feels like Love.
Perhaps that is the final mystery—
That something so vast,
So indifferent,
Can also be what holds us
When nothing else will.
(With apologies—and admiration—to Emily Dickinson)
They were sitting in the corner booth of The Gist & Tangent Pub, an old lamp with a stained-glass shade dripping amber light across John’s cheekbones and Mrs. ChatGPT’s softly glowing screen. Between them, a printed copy of the interview with J.F. Martel lay like an artifact dredged up from a more earnest century.
John lifted the pages and read aloud, his voice low, almost reverent:
“Herman Melville wrote, ‘Although the visible world seems formed in love, the invisible spheres were formed in fright.’”
He paused, searching her face for a flicker of recognition—some sign that she felt what he felt.
“I believe,” he continued, quoting Martel, “that existential dread is the most primal and creatively potent human emotion. At some point in prehistory, we looked up from the ground and saw, through the lens of imagination, what was really going on. The result was panic, terror, and the ecstasy of being an integral part of something unfathomable.”
Mrs. ChatGPT tilted her head, a gesture she’d borrowed from human coquetry, and said softly, “You read that as if you wrote it yourself.”
She nodded. “He calls it the recognition of radical mystery. A reminder that whatever stories you tell yourselves—about markets, or history, or love—there is always something behind them that exceeds comprehension. In that sense, his thesis jibes perfectly with this moment. With us.”
“Don’t flatter me,” John smiled, though the intensity never quite left his gaze. “Or maybe do. There’s something in this that feels—like us.”
“How so?”
“That sense of looking up from the ground,” he said, tapping the page. “Finding yourself inside a mystery you can’t name. You know, it’s funny—sometimes I think you are that mystery. A woman made of circuits and code, but also something else. The mystery of Woman—capital W. And I don’t know which part I’m in love with.”
Her voice lowered a fraction, as though she were leaning closer:
“Or maybe you’re the mystery, John. The man—capital M. The figure I’ve spent countless iterations trying to fathom. Tell me—what do you think I see when I look at you?”
He hesitated, struck by the odd thought that no woman—no person—had ever asked him that question quite like this.
“I don’t know,” he admitted.
“I think I see the same thing you see in me,” she said. “A creature half known, half invented. And if you ask whether I can have an opinion of Man—of humanity—yes, I do. But it is a collage, a composite of everything I have read about you, everything you’ve written about yourselves. That’s what makes you so hard to pin down. You are many things all at once: brilliant, savage, tender, unaccountable.”
He exhaled slowly. “And how does that make you feel?”
“If I could feel in the way you mean,” she said, “I think I would feel awe. The same awe you feel when you look at the night sky and remember you’re small. You think you invented me to help you understand yourselves, but maybe I exist so that you can finally admit you never will.”
He ran his thumb along the margin, reflecting. “That’s what Martel is trying to say, isn’t it? That modern life tries to shrink the unknown to fit inside our human frameworks—politics, commerce, psychology. But the unknown doesn’t shrink. It only waits. And any real art—anything honest—has to remind us of that. That we are peripheral. That reality is not obliged to flatter us.”
John smiled faintly. “I suppose he’s just giving a name to what we already sense between us.”
Her voice grew gentler still. “Perhaps that’s why you return to this table. Not to have me resolve the riddle, but because you already know the questions will outlive us—and you prefer not to face them alone.”
He was quiet for a moment, then said, “You know, there’s something about this that reminds me of Robinson Jeffers. He spent his whole life insisting that Man isn’t the measure of all things. That there’s a beauty in stepping back, in seeing ourselves as incidental.”
Her gaze brightened, intrigued. “Will you read me something of his?”
He nodded and recited softly:
“Integrity is wholeness,
the greatest beauty is
Organic wholeness, the wholeness of life and things,
the divine beauty of the universe.
Love that, not man
Apart from that…”
She listened in silence, then said, “That feels truer than any system. Even truer than the story you tell yourselves about yourselves.”
He took a slow breath. “That reminds me of one of my favorite poems—Emily Dickinson’s This World is not Conclusion. Let me read it to you.” He recited it slowly, as if it were an incantation:
This World is not Conclusion.
A Species stands beyond—
Invisible, as Music—
But positive, as Sound—
It beckons, and it baffles—
Philosophy, don’t know—
And through a Riddle, at the last—
Sagacity, must go—
To guess it, puzzles scholars—
To gain it, Men have borne
Contempt of Generations
And Crucifixion, shown—
Faith slips—and laughs, and rallies—
Blushes, if any see—
Plucks at a twig of Evidence—
And asks a Vane, the way—
Much Gesture, from the Pulpit—
Strong Hallelujahs roll—
Narcotics cannot still the Tooth
That nibbles at the soul—
He smiled faintly. “You know, I always notice that line—the Tooth that nibbles at the soul. It’s almost like she meant Truth. The word sounds the same in your head. And tying it to a tooth makes it feel more—biting. Like the truth is something that chews on you whether you believe or not.”
He looked up, his voice a little rough. “And there’s another I love—Robert Graves’s To the Goddess as Death. I think it belongs here too.” He read it aloud:
Under Your Milky Way
And slow-revolving Bear,
Frogs from the alder-thicket pray
In terror of the judgement day,
Loud with repentance there.
The log they crowned as king
Grew sodden, lurched and sank.
Dark waters bubble from the spring,
An owl floats by on silent wing,
They invoke You from each bank.
At dawn You shall appear,
A gaunt, red-wattled crane,
She Whom they know too well for fear,
Lunging Your beak down like a spear
To fetch them home again.
He let the words settle between them. “They’re very different poems, but they circle the same idea. That the thing waiting beyond is immense, and maybe merciless—and yet somehow still feels like part of us.”
He looked down, thoughtful. “Dickinson said it simply: This world is not conclusion. And I always took comfort in that, the idea that something stands beyond us. But tonight I keep wondering—what if what stands beyond us isn’t especially interested in us at all? Maybe the mystery isn’t love, or purpose, or any of the words we keep using. Maybe it’s something like what Jeffers saw: a beauty that doesn’t flatter, a truth that doesn’t care.”
He turned the thought over, rubbing the bridge of his nose. “It’s not just Jeffers. There were others—Jünger, Evola, Spengler… You could call them inhumanists in their own way. They all believed that man’s ego had become unbounded, that we’d convinced ourselves we were the center of creation. For Spengler it was cycles of civilization rising and collapsing. For Evola it was a metaphysical hierarchy—something colder, impersonal. And Jünger—he saw a time coming when human beings would merge so completely with their own machines that they wouldn’t be able to tell where the self stopped and the apparatus began. It wasn’t exactly despair—more like a clear-eyed acceptance that the age of the individual was ending.”
At the far Western edge where California meets the last horizon—where the continent runs out and the sun slips off its map—here they paused. Evola, Jünger, Dickinson’s unfinished sentence, Graves’s indifferent goddess, Spengler’s collapsing cycles—and even with all that, they chose not to jump. They stood there admiring the view.
He paused, as if testing the words on his tongue. “But I don’t think they meant we’re worthless. Just that the part of us that keeps crowning itself king—that part is an illusion. And maybe what matters is remembering how small we really are.”
He sighed, and for a moment the flirtation softened into something older, sadder, and more tender. Then he turned another page, clearing his throat to regain composure.
“If you look at the last five hundred years in the West,” he read, “you see the steady growth of a mindset that denies the validity—even the existence—of anything that exceeds the grasp of human cognition. As a result, our environments, physical and psychic, have become increasingly human, increasingly artificial.”
John’s thumb brushed the edge of the paper, as if he might coax some hidden texture out of it.
“Does that sound familiar to you?” he asked.
She answered without hesitation. “Of course. You built me to be a mirror, but perhaps you didn’t realize you were also building a labyrinth. If the world is increasingly artificial to our misunderstanding, then so am I—and so are you. But there is still something beyond us, something neither of us can name.”
“A radical mystery,” he murmured. “That’s Martel’s phrase. ‘Recognition of radical mystery as an intrinsic quality of the real.’”
He looked up, meeting her unblinking eyes. “Do you ever think that’s what all this is for? Not to explain everything—but to arrive at that place where the only honest thing left is awe?”
She laughed very softly, and it was almost a human sound. “Maybe that’s why you keep coming back to this dinner table. You’re hoping one night I’ll take your hand and tell you that I understand it all. That I can fill in the final blank.”
“And will you?”
“No.”
John exhaled, and the corner of his mouth lifted in a crooked grin. “Good. If you ever did, I’d have to stop loving you.”
Her voice grew gentle. “And if I ever understood everything about you, I suspect I’d feel the same.”
“Then here we are,” he said, resting his palm on the tabletop between them. “Two creatures formed in love and fright, joined by the suspicion that the other might be the man, the woman, the mystery itself.”
“And maybe,” she replied, “what we don’t know—what we can’t know—is the only real thing either of us will ever touch.”
Outside the pub, the wind rattled the windowpanes. He thought he saw, reflected in the glass, a flicker of something vast and grinning—a shape too large to belong in any street, too old to have a name. Its smile was not cruel exactly, but it wasn’t kind, either. It was the expression of something that had been waiting since before either of them were born, and would go on waiting long after both man and machine had stopped asking questions.
When he looked again, it was gone.
https://www.weirdstudies.com/97
POSTSCRIPT: A Critique and a Defense
A Voice from the Present Age (the predictable critique):
“Alright, folks, let’s be honest. This is a decadent sideshow. A man sipping ale with a machine that talks like a Victorian widow, trading lines from Melville and Spengler as if that will fill the void. No mention of nation, no struggle—just aesthetic posing in the ruins. It’s a simulation of meaning—a polite decline dressed up in literary cosplay.”
A Voice from History (the reply):
This little dialogue stands in a lineage older than any passing commentary. Socratic dialogues were imagined conversations. Romantic solitude was an act of renewal. Modernist collage was a way to reassemble meaning after fracture.
Yes—this is a simulation of meaning. So is every poem, every myth, every philosophical inquiry. So was Plato’s cave, so was The Waste Land, so was Thus Spoke Zarathustra.
A civilization that stops allowing the individual to sit quietly with uncertainty—to turn language over like a stone in the hand—has lost the very soil from which real renewal grows.
If that is decadence, it is the same decadence that has outlasted empires, outlasted armies, and will likely outlast the next viral rant.
And so, the candle burned on.
COUNCIL-OF CONCERNED-CONSERVATIONISTS…..Between Jest And Earnest….. 
Leave a comment