DISCLOSURE DAY AS CONTENT

—How to Defuse a Revelation by Diffusing It—


OCCULTURE WATCH

*On Certain Relationships Between Aliens and Children

—by Mason Freeman


The Council has been informed that the latest cinematic offering from Hollywood concerns aliens who establish contact with selected children.

Readers are assured that this is entirely different from every other situation in which mysterious powerful entities establish special relationships with selected children.

In older centuries such beings were called fairies.

Later they were called angels.


Harmonies by Ghislaine.
The meaning of which is from old Germanic name, one of which is “hostage.”
Further commentary has been deemed unnecessary.


A Council Tangent Within the Gist

In Yeats’ poem, the fairies offered enchanted forests and silver trout.
Modern visitors appear to prefer designer handbags, cash, and complimentary travel to tropical islands. The invitation remains remarkably similar. Only the marketing has changed.


Occasionally the alien presences were called secret masters, ascended adepts, hidden chiefs, spirit guides, invisible colleges, visitors from beyond the stars, or a Brit with spy agency lineage and connection offering expensive purses to vulnerable teenagers.

The terminology has evolved. The narrative structure remains surprisingly durable.

The child receives attention unavailable to ordinary adults. The child is told that he or she has been chosen. The child receives special knowledge. The child gains access to hidden realities. The child becomes part of a select community of initiates.

The adults fail to understand. The authorities arrive too late. The chosen child is vindicated.

This sequence appears with remarkable consistency across folklore, religion, esotericism, science fiction, major motion pictures, and current events surrounding Epstein Island in its most generous reading.

We are assured that this repetition is merely coincidental.

Certain uncharitable observers have nevertheless noted the unfortunate timing.

At the very moment public discussion has become preoccupied with the question of powerful figures cultivating unusual relationships with the young, audiences are invited to celebrate a story in which powerful alien intelligences cultivate unusual relationships with the young.

The studio naturally intends no such comparison. Neither, for the record, could the Council not fail to notice. We merely note that modern mythology continues to display an almost supernatural ability to step directly on historical rakes.

One is therefore left with an uncomfortable question.

If a civilization wished to demonstrate that it remained entirely incapable of recognizing certain patterns, what would it do differently?

The public spends years discussing powerful figures, vulnerable children, secret networks, selective access, unexplained protections, missing information, and the mysterious reluctance of institutions to ask obvious questions.

Then, as if on cue, the culture’s premier dream factory unveils a spectacular tale in which powerful alien intelligences establish special relationships with selected children and audiences are encouraged to regard the arrangement as wondrous.

Again, we are assured the two subjects are unrelated.

The Council merely records that the coincidence arrived carrying a brass band, a searchlight, and a promotional budget of several hundred million dollars.

In former ages such spectacles might have been called omens. Today they are called summer releases.

The Council takes no position on whether this constitutes a humiliation ritual.

We merely observe that if one wished to design a humiliation ritual, one would presumably begin by presenting an uncomfortable parallel directly in front of the public and then waiting to see whether anyone noticed.

Most do not.

The modern citizen has developed remarkable resistance to pattern recognition whenever sufficient entertainment value is involved.

Indeed, one of the great achievements of contemporary civilization may be its ability to convert nearly any subject into content. Scandal becomes content. Revelation becomes content. Anxiety becomes content. Conspiracy becomes content. Even the investigation of reality itself eventually becomes content.

The audience is thereby relieved of the burden of deciding what anything means. The popcorn machine will decide.

Some readers will undoubtedly object that the comparison is unfair. The Council doesn’t consider it a matter of fairness. That is, in fact, what makes the comparison interesting.

For if the comparison were fair, it would no longer possess the peculiar quality of arriving uninvited, standing awkwardly in the corner, and refusing to leave.

The Council therefore files the matter under:

COINCIDENCES OF UNUSUAL TIMING

Further classification remains pending.

—Mason Freeman, C-of-C-C Occulture Expert

Leave a comment